Train your team on what they need

The training your team needs is always too specific for any course catalog, and building it yourself takes weeks. Cognerra generates it in minutes on any topic, adapts to each person's level, and proves they actually understood it.

Get in touch
Event-Driven Architecture Migration 5 members
Member Status Progress
sarah@acme.com Completed
100%
james@acme.com In progress
72%
priya@acme.com In progress
45%
carlos@acme.com In progress
18%
lin@acme.com Not started
0%

Team training is broken.

Every option leaves the same gap between "training available" and "team actually trained."

X

The training that doesn't exist

You need your team to learn your specific stack, your internal process, your domain context. No course on Udemy or LinkedIn Learning covers it. So you spend weeks building slides and docs that go stale in months.

X

The training nobody finishes

You bought platform seats. But in a 2022 SHRM benchmark, 24% of employees said training wasn't relevant to their role, and 38% wanted it to be more relevant to their actual work.1 Generic content doesn't stick.

X

The training you can't track

You sent your team a doc, a video, a wiki page. Did they read it? Did they understand it? You have no idea. There's no feedback loop.

Cognerra closes all three gaps: any topic, real comprehension, full visibility.

How it works for teams

From topic to trained team in minutes, not months.

1

Generate a course

Describe what your team needs to learn — as specific as you want. Cognerra builds a structured course in minutes.

2

Assign it

One click assigns the course to your team. Everyone sees it in their library.

3

Each person learns at their level

A quick diagnostic adapts the course to each team member. The senior engineer skips basics; the new hire gets full coverage.

4

Verify and track

Quizzes, exercises, and teach-back practice prove they understood it. You see exactly who completed what and where they struggled.

Use cases

Any topic your team needs, in the format that ensures they actually learn it.

Onboarding new hires

Generate a course on your team's architecture, deployment process, or domain. New hires get structured onboarding on day one — not a 200-page wiki nobody reads.

Tech stack upskilling

Your team adopted a new tool, framework, or service. Instead of hoping everyone reads the docs, generate training that covers your specific use case and verifies understanding.

Cross-functional knowledge

Help non-technical team members understand the technical context, or help engineers understand the business domain. Courses adapt to each person's starting knowledge.

Process and compliance

Internal processes, security practices, regulatory requirements. Generate structured training and know exactly who completed it.

Why not the status quo?

Every alternative leaves the same gaps.

vs. Udemy / LinkedIn Learning

Their catalog has 20,000 courses. None of them are about your specific stack, your specific process, or your specific context. You're paying per seat for generic training your team doesn't finish.

vs. Building it yourself

Industry benchmarks put custom course development at 43 to 184 hours per finished hour of content,2 and 67% of teams say limited resources are the main barrier to building faster.3 Cognerra generates it in minutes, with built-in comprehension checks you'd never have time to create.

vs. "Just read the docs"

Docs are reference material, not learning material. There's no structure, no progression, no way to know if someone actually understood it. Reading docs gives you "I looked at it" instead of "I understand it."

Key capabilities

Designed around how people actually learn

Cognerra's approach is grounded in decades of cognitive science research, not just content generation.

Retrieval practice

Learners who are tested during learning retain significantly more than those who simply re-read. Roediger and Karpicke demonstrated this in a foundational 2006 study, and Dunlosky's review rated practice testing as one of the highest-utility learning techniques available.4

Teach-back

When learners explain concepts in their own words, understanding deepens. A 2020 systematic review by Talevski et al. found teach-back produced positive outcomes in 19 of 20 studies examined.5

Active learning

Active methods consistently outperform passive instruction. Freeman et al. found active learning raised exam performance by about 6% and that students in lecture-only conditions were 1.5x more likely to fail.6

What does your team need to learn?

Get in touch to set up a team plan. Generate your first course in minutes.

Contact Us

Questions

The team plan adds course assignment, progress tracking, and team management. You assign courses and see exactly who completed them. Individual accounts don't give you visibility into your team's learning.

You get an invite link. Share it with your team via Slack, email, or however you communicate. They click, sign up if they haven't, and join your team.

Yes. Every team member gets personal course creations in addition to the courses you assign. They can explore topics relevant to their role.

Anything you can describe. Your tech stack, internal processes, industry regulations, domain knowledge. If you can explain what your team needs to learn, Cognerra can build it.

Sources

  1. TalentLMS in partnership with SHRM, 2022 Workplace Learning & Development Trends, 2022. talentlms.com
  2. Chapman Alliance, How Long Does It Take to Create Learning?, 2010. chapmanalliance.com
  3. ATD Research, How Long Does It Take to Develop Training? New Question, New Answers, 2021. td.org
  4. Roediger & Karpicke, Test-Enhanced Learning, Psychological Science, 2006; Dunlosky et al., Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques, 2013. doi.org
  5. Talevski et al., Teach-Back: A Systematic Review of Implementation and Impacts, PLoS One, 2020. doi.org
  6. Freeman et al., Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics, PNAS, 2014. doi.org